The bench said that the in view of these facts, they were not inclined to entertain the PIL.
The Bombay high court on Tuesday dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking to defer the implementation of the Goods and Service Tax (GST) till the new financial year.According to the petitioner, many states and union territories have not yet decided to make laws and have not declared their proposed rates. "It is much evident that all such necessary steps are taken by the respondents to ensure implementation of the GST," observed that bench adding, "It appears that over 65 lakh tax-payers have already migrated to GST network and obtained registrations, the rates and taxes have been notified; rules have been framed and notified; entire machinery has been geared upnot only to accept new challenge but to ensure GST is https://www.bettnmac.com/ woodworking machinery Suppliers implemented effectively".
The division bench of Justice V K Tahilramani and Justice Sandeep K Shinde dismissed the petition filed by Dr Pillai. Petitioner Dr Kanagasabapathy Sundaram Pillai claimed that it had legal flaws and the government was ill-prepared to adopt the new tax system. He alleged that the implementation of GST is without parliamentary sanction and its implementation in the middle of the financial year is not valid.
The HC was satisfied with the steps taken by the government to implement the new tax, hence, refused to entertain the petition.The bench observed that the written submissions of additional solicitor general Anil Singh have shown that the GST has sanction of law. Dr Pillai also expressed doubt as to whether Acts in their current form will be effective in reducing the regulatory and administrative hurdles..He requested the bench to defer implementation of GST till all legal flaws are removed or till full decision of final rates for all items including state surcharge items preparation is done by all the states and union territories.
The Bombay high court on Tuesday dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking to defer the implementation of the Goods and Service Tax (GST) till the new financial year.According to the petitioner, many states and union territories have not yet decided to make laws and have not declared their proposed rates. "It is much evident that all such necessary steps are taken by the respondents to ensure implementation of the GST," observed that bench adding, "It appears that over 65 lakh tax-payers have already migrated to GST network and obtained registrations, the rates and taxes have been notified; rules have been framed and notified; entire machinery has been geared upnot only to accept new challenge but to ensure GST is https://www.bettnmac.com/ woodworking machinery Suppliers implemented effectively".
The division bench of Justice V K Tahilramani and Justice Sandeep K Shinde dismissed the petition filed by Dr Pillai. Petitioner Dr Kanagasabapathy Sundaram Pillai claimed that it had legal flaws and the government was ill-prepared to adopt the new tax system. He alleged that the implementation of GST is without parliamentary sanction and its implementation in the middle of the financial year is not valid.
The HC was satisfied with the steps taken by the government to implement the new tax, hence, refused to entertain the petition.The bench observed that the written submissions of additional solicitor general Anil Singh have shown that the GST has sanction of law. Dr Pillai also expressed doubt as to whether Acts in their current form will be effective in reducing the regulatory and administrative hurdles..He requested the bench to defer implementation of GST till all legal flaws are removed or till full decision of final rates for all items including state surcharge items preparation is done by all the states and union territories.
コメント